23/07/2026 12:00

Sala Descubre/Online Teams. Edificio 8E. Acceso J - 4ª Planta | Universitat Politècnica de València. 46022

Abstract: Despite the lack of a universally accepted definition of inclusive innovation, the need to rethink innovation policy in a more capacious sense has been stimulated by critical perspectives of innovation policy which asks: what innovation is, and who it is for? Research points to a focus on elite STEM-centric models of innovation, located in the urban core, raising concerns for who has power and voice in setting innovation priorities and who ultimately benefits from innovation policy and practice. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with key actors representing the quadruple helix (public sector, private sector, higher education and further education and civil society) our report explores the ways in which four UK city-regions in Belfast, Cardiff, Glasgow and Greater Manchester are addressing the challenge of delivering inclusive innovation in practice.

We identify three dimensions of inclusive innovation within place-based settings: sectoral, socio-spatial and political. Taken together, these encapsulate the who, what, where and how of delivering inclusive innovation. These three dimensions also bring to light tensions around setting innovation priorities (frontier versus foundational economy, engagement with small versus large anchor companies and engaging the public), choices around where to focus innovation investment and activity (core versus periphery areas, redistribution mechanisms- sharing the benefits of innovation activity) and political agency (complexities, fragmentation and continuity of evolving multi-level governance structures). In the wider sense, our multi-dimensional lens shows that the question as to whether to focus on inclusive innovation as an outcome or a process persists and our report points to a number of policy implications that emerged from our research. At the core of our argument are central government policy issues related to policy churn, framing and centralisation which challenge the coordination of multilevel policymaking. Our report draws on the experience of interlocuters across city-regions located in each of the devolved nations of the UK to underscore the need to calibrate directionality and subsidiarity in order to deliver effective place-based inclusive innovation policy which delivers more equitable and inclusive forms of economic growth.

Bio: Undergraduate and initial postgraduate study was undertaken at the University of Auckland (NZ). After a period of work in public policy, I completed doctoral research at the University of St Andrews. I was a Research Associate at Cardiff University prior to joining the University of Glasgow. My research focuses on the development of second-tier city-regions and I am interested in both the underpinning production systems at and the governance responses for these places.

My research draws on multi-disciplinary perspectives, meshing economic geography with specific areas of heterodox economics, particularly critical realism. I have interests in urban innovation and infrastructure, and within these policy arenas I am focused on the re-emergence of inclusive growth agendas, as well as other alternative economic development agendas that seek to achieve a balance across environmental, social and economic objectives.

________________________________________________________________________________

Reunión de Microsoft Teams

Unirse: https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/38680583846392?p=Y9JgcWSrSH7VGSderu

Id. de reunión: 386 805 838 463 92

Código de acceso: kX7eR3Qj